更新时间：2026-08-26 来源：互联网编辑：顺马点击数： 72875次

花嫁

再次抓捕尹锡悦韩国公调处在总统官邸外与警卫处发生对峙_我的网站

罗生门

A | 视频加载中...当地时间15日凌晨，稍早前抵达位于首尔市龙山区的韩国总统官邸的韩国高级公职人员犯罪调查处（公调处）人员，出示法院签发的对总统尹锡悦的逮捕令，与总统警卫处人员在总统官邸外发生对峙。执法人员试图进入官邸，同阻挡人员发生冲撞、推搡。

B | HELENA, Mont. -- A federal judge in Montana is continuing to block enforcement of a law that puts restrictions on drag shows and bans drag reading events in public schools and libraries, saying Friday that the law targets free speech and expression and that the text of the law and its legislative history "evince anti-LGBTQ+ animus.”The preliminary injunction, granted by U.S. District Court Judge Brian Morris, prevents enforcement of the law while a lawsuit filed on July 6 moves through the court process. Morris heard arguments over the injunction on Aug. 28.In briefs, the state argued “the Legislature determined sexually oriented performances and drag reading events to be indecent and inappropriate for minors,” and potentially harmful. Protecting minors from divergent gender expression is not the same as protecting minors from obscene speech, attorney Constance Van Kley argued for the plaintiffs during the Aug. 28 hearing.Montana law already protects minors from exposure to obscenities, the plaintiffs argued.“The state hasn't argued meaningfully that the speech targeted by (the new law) — beyond the obscenity already regulated — is potentially harmful to children," the plaintiffs argued in court filings.The state is not trying to establish a new obscenity standard in regulating drag performances, Assistant Attorney General Michael Russell said during arguments over the injunction. “We're arguing that they're indecent and improper for minors only,” and that the state has an interest to protect minors from that kind of conduct, he said.“No evidence before the Court indicates that minors face any harm from drag-related events or other speech and expression critical of gender norms,” Morris wrote in granting the injunction.Morris had granted a temporary restraining order against the law in late July, in time to allow Montana Pride to hold its 30th annual celebration in Helena without concerns about violating the law.The judge said the way the law was written would “disproportionally harm not only drag performers, but any person who falls outside traditional gender and identity norms.” He said the law did not adequately define actions that might be illegal and appears likely to ”encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement."The law seeks to ban minors from attending “sexually oriented performances,” and bans such performances in public places where children are present. However, it does not adequately define many of the terms used in the law, causing people to self-censor out of fear of prosecution, attorneys for the plaintiffs argue. The law also made Montana the first state to specifically ban drag kings and drag queens — which it defined as performers who adopt a flamboyant or parodic male or female persona with glamorous or exaggerated costumes and makeup — from reading books to children in public schools or libraries, even if the performances do not have a sexual element. The law does not define terms like “flamboyant,” “parodic” or “glamorous,” Morris said in July.Enforcement can include fines for businesses if minors attend a “sexually oriented performance.” The law also calls for the loss of state licenses for teachers or librarians, and the loss of state funding for schools or libraries, that allow drag reading events to be held. It allows someone who, as a minor, attended a drag performance that violated the law to sue those who promoted or participated in the event at any time over a 10-year period after the performance. Montana’s law is flawed — like similar laws in Florida and Tennessee that have been blocked by courts — because it regulates speech based on its content and viewpoint, without taking into account its potential literary, artistic, political or scientific value, Morris found in July.The U.S. Supreme Court in 1972 set guidelines to determine whether something is obscene: Whether the work appeals to the prurient interest — a degrading or excessive interest in sexual matters; whether it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and whether the work lacks serious serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.Like many Republican-led states, Montana’s conservative lawmakers have passed other laws targeting transgender people. The state's law banning gender-affirming medical care for minors has been blocked by a state judge. Montana's Republican-controlled legislature also passed a bill to define sex as only “male” or “female” in state law. That law was challenged this week, with arguments that it blocks legal recognition and protections to transgender, nonbinary and intersex residents.“It is absolutely impermissible for the government to deny benefits to a group of people on the basis of their straightforward hostility to them,” said Van Kley. In the “male” or “female” sex case, “there is pretty substantial evidence that the intent was to target transgender people,” Van Kley added.。韩国警方开始驱离现场阻挡人员。尹锡悦代理律师以及执政党国会议员、尹锡悦支持者等在官邸外形成人墙，阻挡执法人员进入官邸。尹锡悦律师团在官邸入口处阻止公调处调查人员进入官邸区，与调查人员形成对峙，并称逮捕令非法。公调处警告称，妨碍公务执行人员将可能被视为现行犯遭逮捕。（总台记者唐鑫）相关阅读此前据韩国媒体披露，韩国高级公职人员犯罪调查处（公调处）和警方可能于15日再次执行对尹锡悦的逮捕令。公调处12日已经向国防部和总统警卫处发送公文，要求他们协助对尹锡悦执行逮捕令。

C | 这一举动被认为是公调处提前发出“警告信息”。（韩国公调处或将于1月15日再次尝试逮捕尹锡悦）△1月3日，韩国公调处调查人员进入总统官邸，尝试逮捕尹锡悦针对尹锡悦的第一份逮捕令去年12月31日获首尔西部地方法院签发，有效期为自签发之日起7天，也就是1月6日午夜到期。韩国高级公职人员犯罪调查处（公调处）和警方1月3日对尹锡悦执行逮捕令，但遭到总统警卫处阻拦。

D | 双方对峙5个多小时后，抓捕行动宣告失败。（百余人参与超5小时对峙对尹锡悦逮捕令暂停执行 5个关键词直击全程→>>）△1月6日，韩国总统官邸附近1月6日，韩国警方和公调处都证实，公调处已向警方发送了对尹锡悦逮捕令执行的全权委托公文——也就是说，公调处将逮捕令的执行权移交给了警方，但仍保留调查权。不过警方随后先是称，公调处发送的公文“存在法律缺陷”，且当天抓捕尹锡悦“存在现实困难”；之后又表示，尹锡悦逮捕令的“执行主体应是公调处”，不宜由警方来执行。1月7日，首尔西部地方法院再度签发针对尹锡悦的逮捕令，但逮捕令有效期未对外公开。据韩联社报道，逮捕令通常自签发之日起一周内有效。由于执行逮捕遇阻，本次逮捕令延长期限可能超过7天。（韩国法院再次批准对尹锡悦逮捕令调查机构酝酿第二次行动>>）△1月14日，总统警卫处人员在总统官邸1月14日上午，由韩国高级公职人员犯罪调查处、警察厅、国防部组成的“共同调查本部”，又同总统警卫处负责人会面，就执行逮捕令一事进行讨论。